Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
NOTICE: We have moved the Case search portal to the following site. Please use the link below to access the new portal.

https://acis.nvcourts.gov/portal/home

For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Combined Case Information: 81887-COA & 81887
Short Caption:SNYDER VS. SNYDER C/W 82756/83029Court:Court of Appeals & Supreme Court
Consolidated:81887-COA*, 82756-COA, 83029-COARelated Case(s):81887, 82243, 82756, 82756-COA, 83029, 83029-COA, 83620, 83651, 84730, 84730-COA, 87292, 87465, 87568, 87692, 88729, 90382
Lower Court Case(s):Elko Co. - Fourth Judicial District - DR-MD-17-757Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
10/06/2020Filing FeeFiling Fee due for Appeal. Filing fee will be forwarded by the District Court. (SC)
10/06/2020Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)20-36655
10/06/2020Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Regarding Deadlines. (SC)20-36659
10/14/2020Filing FeeFiling Fee Paid. $250.00 from Raymond Max Snyder. Money Order no. 26686890663. (SC)
10/16/2020Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Transmission of Record. Record due: 30 days. (SC)20-38096
10/20/2020MotionFiled Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Directing Transmission of Record. (SC)20-38354
10/23/2020Docketing StatementFiled Proper Person Appellant's Docketing Statement Civil Appeals. (SC)20-38995
10/27/2020Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 08/18/20, 08/19/20, 08/20/20 and 08/21/20. To Court Reporter: Julie Rowan. (SC)20-39322
10/27/2020Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 08/18/20, 08/19/20, 08/20/20 and 08/21/20. To Court Reporter: Julie Rowan. (SC)20-39339
10/27/2020Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement Civil Appeals. (SC)20-39341
11/03/2020Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Response to Motion for a Criminal Investigation and for Sanctions and Defendants' Misrepresentation of Facts in Her Response and Request for Punative Damages and Affidavit of Raymond Max Snyder. (SC)20-40056
11/04/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Stay Judgment. (SC)20-40157
11/04/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Objection to Motion for Reconsideration of Order Directing Transmission of Record.20-40158
11/04/2020MotionFiled Respondent's Opposition to Motion for Stay. (SC)20-40257
11/04/2020MotionFiled Respondent's Reply in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of Order Directing Transmission of Record. (SC)20-40258
11/10/2020Letter/IncomingFiled Proper Person Appellant's Letter Regarding Case. (SC)20-41213
11/10/2020Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Provide Proof of Service. Due date: 10 days. Letter Regarding Case. (SC)20-41215
11/12/2020Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Entry of Order. (SC)20-41312
11/17/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's "4JDCR Rule 13(2)(c) Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion to Withdraw was Prior to Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal; Plaintiff's; Motion for a New Trial and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay." (SC)20-42001
11/17/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Quash Orders. (SC)20-42004
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1. part 1. (SC).20-42080
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 2. (SC).20-42089
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 3. (SC).20-42092
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 4. (SC).20-42094
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 5. (SC).20-42095
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 6. (SC).20-42097
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 7. (SC).20-42102
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 1 part 8. (SC).20-42112
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 2 part 1. (SC).20-42115
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 2 part 2. (SC).20-42116
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 2 part 3. (SC).20-42118
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 2 part 4. (SC).20-42121
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 2 part 5. (SC).20-42122
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 2 part 6. (SC).20-42123
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 3. (SC).20-42128
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 3 - Part 2. (SC).20-42145
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 4 - Part 1. (SC).20-42172
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 4 - Part 2. (SC).20-42181
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 5. (SC)20-42205
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 5E. (SC)20-42208
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 5I. (SC)20-42211
11/18/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 6. (SC)20-42217
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 6C. (SC)20-42226
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 6G. (SC)20-42227
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 7. (SC)20-42228
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 7D. (SC)20-42229
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 8. (SC)20-42230
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 9. (SC)20-42251
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 10. (SC)20-42255
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 10E. (SC)20-42256
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Volume 11. (SC)20-42259
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Appellant Exhibits. (SC)20-42261
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Respondent Exhibits. (SC)20-42286
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Respondent Exhibit F. (SC)20-42287
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Respondent Exhibits K. (SC)20-42288
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Respondent Exhibits O. (SC)20-42290
11/19/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal 11/19/20 Case Summary. (SC)20-42294
11/24/2020MotionFiled Response to Appellant's 4JDCR Rule 13(2)(C) Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion to Withdraw was Prior to Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal, Plaintiff's; Motion for a New Trial and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay.20-42884
11/25/2020Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Appellant's Certificate of Service (Letter Regarding Case). (SC)20-42971
11/25/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's 4JDCR Rule 13(2)(C) Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate All of Plaintiff's Pleadings Disallowed by Judge Robert Estes; and Motion for a New Trial; and Motion to Stay Judgment Entered in this Case by Judge Estes. Motion to Have Judge Estes Withdraw from this Case; and Motion to Strike All Pleadings and Order's of Judge Estes Resulting from the November 10, 2020 Hearing. (SC)20-42991
11/25/2020Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Based on respondent's arguments, it appears respondent actually seeks to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion is thus treated as a motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss this appeal is denied. Appellant moves for a stay pending appeal and respondent opposes the motion. The motion for a stay is denied without prejudice. This order has no effect with respect to the notice of appeal filed in this court or this court's jurisdiction over this appeal. Respondent also argues that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after the filing of a motion for a new trial. It appears that the notice of appeal is not premature. Appellant has filed copies of several documents filed in the district court. As these documents do not request any specific relief from this court, this court takes no action on these documents. (SC)20-43067
12/02/2020Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal 12/02/20 Case Summary. (SC)20-43562
12/07/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Stay Judgment. (SC)20-44408
12/07/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Sanctions Against Aaron Bushur and Defendant Lauara Snyder and to Deny Mrs. Snyder (SIC) Sanction Request Against Mr. Snyder and to Set Aside Judgment and Affidavit of Raymond Snyder; and Opposition to Motion to Quash and Opposition to Motion to Quash Defendant's Hearing for Order to Show Cause for Collusion etc.; and Motion for Attorney Fees and Sanctions and NRS 115.010 Objection to the Order to Show Cause Hearing Held November 10, 2020 in Fourth District Judicial Court, Elko County, Nevada. (SC)20-44422
12/09/2020Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Court reporter Julie Rowan's court reporter certificate due: December 24, 2020. (SC)20-44745
12/09/2020MotionFiled Respondent's Opposition to Motion to Stay Judgment. (SC)20-44847
12/15/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Rule of Civil Procedure 60(B)(3) Motion to Deny Request to Register a Foreign Judgment and Motion for Sanctions and Attorney Fees and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. (SC)20-45382
12/15/2020Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. CASE SUMMARY. (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 12/15/20) (SC)
12/15/2020Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (SC)20-45471
12/18/2020MotionFiled Respondent's Response to Rule of Civil Procedure 60(B)(3) Motion to Deny Request to Register a Foreign Judgment Etc. (SC)20-45843
12/21/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Stay the Appellant Requirement to Furnish a Security Bond as Provided by Rules 8(A), 62(D) & (E) and NV Rev State 20.037(4), (2017). (SC)20-46091
12/21/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Reply to "Opposition to Max Snyder's 4JDCR 13(2)(C) Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate All of Plaintiff's Pleadings Disallowed by Judge Robert Estes; and Motion for a New Trial; and Motion to Stay the Judgment Entered in the Case by Judge Estes, Motion to Have Judge Estes Withdraw from this Case; and Motion to Strike All Pleadings and Order's (sic) of Judge Estes Resulting From the November 10, 2020 Hearing. (SC)20-46104
12/21/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Defendant's Opposition to Motion to Stay Judgment. (SC)20-46106
12/24/2020MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion for Summary Judgement. (SC)20-46522
12/28/2020MotionFiled Respondent's Opposition to Stay the Appellant [sic] Requirement to Furnish a Security Bon as Provided by Rules 8(A), 62(D), 2017 [sic]. (SC)20-46657
12/28/2020TranscriptFiled Notice from Nevada Dictation / Julie Rowan stating that the requested transcripts were delivered. Dates of transcripts: 08/18/20, 08/19/20, 08/20/20 and 08/21/20. (SC)20-46686
01/08/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's "Motion to Set Aside Judgements for Fraud on the Court and Purgury and Motion for Attorney Fees and Motion for Sanctions for Sanctions." (SC)21-00576
01/08/2021MotionFiled Proper Person "Plaintiff's Second Motion to Set Aside Judgements for Fraud on the Court and Purgury and Motion for Attorney Fees and Motion for Sanctions for Sanctions." (SC)21-00578
01/08/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's "Motion to be Awarded a Community Property Interest in the Wendover Nevada Business for Defendant's Fraud on the Court."21-00581
01/08/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's "Response to Response to Stay Judgement Entered November 10. 2020. (SC)21-00583
01/08/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's "Response to Defendant's Response to Civil Procedure 60(B)(3) Motion to Deny Request to Register a Foreign Judgement Etc." (SC)21-00586
01/15/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Stay the Appellant Requirement to Furnish a Security Bond as Provided by Rules 8(A), 62(D) & (E) and NV Rev Stat 20.037(4), (2017); and Motion to Stay Judgments. (SC)21-01491
01/15/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Stay Appellant (sic) Requirement to Furnish a Security as Provided by Rules 8(A), 62(D). (SC)21-01500
01/15/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Reply to Respondents Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment; and Request to Submit for Judgment if the Court Wishes to Consider it a Motion to this Court; and Motion for the Court to Furnish Appellant Pro Bono Counsel. (SC)21-01503
01/22/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Defendant's Opposition to Motion to Disqualify Judge Estes for Prejudice; and Affidavit. (SC)21-02041
01/22/2021BriefFiled Proper Person Appellant's Informal Brief. (SC)21-02045
01/26/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Respondent's Opposition to Appellant's Motions Filed January 8, 2021. (SC)21-02452
01/28/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Request for Direction. (SC)21-02654
02/01/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion for Stay and Referring for Pro Bono Counsel. Appellant has filed a pro se motion for a stay pending appeal and a pro se motion to stay the appellate bond requirement. The motions are denied without prejudice. we direct the clerk of this court to transmit a copy of this order and the attached copy of the district court order and case summary to the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada for financial eligibility screening. Appellant's Notice of Appearance or LACSN's Notice due: 60 days. The briefing schedule in this appeal is suspended pending further order of this court. fn1[Appellant has filed copies of several district court filings in this court. This court takes no action on these documents, nor respondent's responses thereto. Appellant is advised that filing copies of documents he has filed in the district court is not necessary. Respondent need not file responses to such documents unless otherwise directed by this court.] (SC)21-03063
02/17/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Reply to Respondents Request for Directions: Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Motion to Stay Appellate Bond Requirement; or in the Alternative Motion for a New Trial; or in the Alternative Sanction Respondent and Enter a Default Judgement in Appellant's Favor. (SC)21-04653
03/05/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant's motion for a stay pending appeal is denied without prejudice. The district court shall have 30 days from the date of this order to enter an order ruling on appellant's pending motions for stay and relating to the supersedeas bond, if it has not done so already, and provide this court with a file-stamped copy of the order. fn2[Appellant's alternative requests for relief are also denied.] (SC)21-06452
03/26/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Docket Entries. (SC)21-08709
03/30/2021MotionFiled Notice of Determination of Eligibility for Pro Bono Representation and Request for Extension of Time. (SC)21-09257
03/31/2021MotionFiled Respondent's Opposition to Request for Extension of Time (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 03/31/21). (SC)
03/31/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Of Rejection - No Notice Of Appearance. (Bronagh M. Kelly). (SC)21-09318
03/31/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance (Bronagh M. Kelly of Woodburn and Wedge as counsel for Respondent). (SC) drichards21-09332
03/31/2021MotionFiled Respondent's Opposition to Request for Extension of Time. (SC)21-09334
04/09/2021Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order After Hearing on March 31, 2021. Filed in district court on April 1, 2021. (SC)21-10336
04/12/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. This court defers to the Legal Aid Center's determination regarding appellant's financial eligibility. The request for an extension of time is granted to the following extent. Notice of appearance due: April 30, 2021. (SC)21-10433
04/12/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Motion to Disqualify Judge Robert Estes from District Court Case. (SC)21-10478
04/13/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Notice - Plaintiff's Request to Submit to Judge Kacin Additional Pleadings for Review of Plaintiff's Request to Disqualify Judge Estes. (SC)21-10726
04/19/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel. Attorney Michael Wall, Esq., appearing on behalf of appellant. (SC)21-11218
04/19/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Respondent's Opposition to Request for Extension of Time. (SC)21-11268
04/19/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Appellant's Notice - Copy of Plaintiff's NRS 1.235(1)(a-b) Amended Third Motion to Disqualify Judge Robert Estes From this Case; and Affidavit. (SC)21-11274
04/22/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Reinstating Briefing and Regarding Response. Appellant: Transcript Request Form due: 14 days; Opening Brief due: 90 days. This court takes no action on appellant's pro se April 19, 2021, response to respondent's opposition to motion for an extension of time as the response was filed after this court granted the extension motion. Appellant's affirmative request for sanctions against respondent is denied. (SC)21-11666
06/07/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Appellant's Reply To Defendant's Response to Notice for Decision Plaintiff's Motion for Relief Etc. Dated May 21, 2021 and Notice to Set For Decision (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 06/07/21). (SC)
06/07/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document.21-16250
06/25/2021MotionFiled Appellant's Motion to Withdraw as Appointed Pro Bono Counsel and Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (First Request). (SC)21-18370
06/28/2021MotionFiled Respondent's Response to Motion to Withdraw. (SC)21-18564
07/06/2021Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Telephonic Extension. Appellant's Reply to Respondent's Response to Motion to Withdraw due: July 20, 2021. (SC)21-19199
07/23/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Motion to the Nevada Supreme Court for Leave to File a NRCP 60(d) Independent Action with the District Court to Hear Fraud on the Court by Both Attorneys. (SC)21-21299
07/23/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Motion NRCP 60(b) (3) and (6) Under NRCP 54 and NRCP 55, Motion for Default Judgment with Prejudice; and NRS 1.230(1) Motion to Recuse Judge Robert Estes and; Affidavit; and NRS 13.050(2)(B) Motion for change of Venue. (SC)21-21304
07/28/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Stay Under NRS 20.0237 at a Reduced Bond in the Amount of $1.00 Resulting from the Fraud by Respondent and her Attorney. (SC)21-21876
07/30/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Notice to Set for Decision, Plaintiff's (Appellant's) Motion to Quash for Non Service and Violation of NRCP 59. (SC)21-22137
07/30/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Defendant's (Respondent's) Opposition to Motion to Quash for Non-Service and Violation of NRCP 59. (SC)21-22140
08/13/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion to Withdraw and Regarding Motions and Briefing. Appellant's pro bono counsel in Docket No. 81887, Michael K. Wall, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. The motion is granted. The clerk shall remove Mr. Wall as counsel of record for appellant in Docket No. 81887. That appeal shall proceed with appellant acting pro se. As appellant has already filed an informal brief, counsel's request for an extension of time for appellant to file an opening brief is denied. On July 23, 2021, appellant filed in each of these appeals identical pro se motions for leave to file an independent action in the district court under NRCP 60(b) and for various other relief. Appellant need not obtain permission from this court before filing motions or other documents in the district court. Appellant has also filed pro se motions for a stay based upon a reduced bond of $1.00. The motion is denied. Appellant has filed copies of a notice and a response addressed to the district court. This court takes no action on these documents. The clerk shall return any future motions that exceed the page limitation or the equivalent type-volume limitation, unfiled. In Docket No. 81887, appellant filed his pro se informal brief on January 22, 2021. Respondent's answering brief due: 21 days. Briefing is now complete in Docket No. 82756. Appellant's informal brief or opening brief remains due to be filed in Docket No. 83029 by October 22, 2021. fn2 [Any relief requested within appellant's pro se response and objection to this notice is denied.] Nos 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-23659
08/18/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. (SC)21-24132
08/19/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Respondent has filed a notice that she will not be filing an answering brief unless directed to do so by this court. Accordingly, briefing of this appeal is now complete. This appeal shall be decided without an answering brief unless specifically directed by this court. (SC)21-24245
08/19/2021Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/Submitted For Decision/To Screening. (SC)
08/20/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Lack of Jurisdiction Under NRCP Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2); With Resident Witness Affidavit and Appellant Affidavit. (RETURNED UNFILED PER ORDER 9/3/21). (SC)
08/26/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Rule 11(C)(4) Motion for Sanctions and NRS 205.09 Order to Pay Restitution. (SC)21-24908
08/26/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Stay Pending a Ruling on His Amended Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Lack of Jurisdiction Under NRCP Rules 12(b)(1) & 12 (b)(2); & Appellant Affidavit. (SC)21-24913
08/26/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Amended Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Lack of Jurisdiction Under NRCP Rules 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(2); & Appellant Affidavit. (SC)21-24916
08/26/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Amended Rule 11(C)(4) Motion for Sanctions and NRS 205.09 Order to Pay Restitution. (SC)21-24917
08/27/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. (SC)21-24983
09/03/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. In Docket Nos. 81887 and 83029 ,the clerk shall return the August 20, 2021, motions to dismiss, unfiled. In Docket Nos. 81887, 82756, and 83029, appellant has filed pro se motions and amended motions to sanction respondent and her counsel for alleged statutory violations, fraud, and forgery, to dismiss "this case," and to grant various other relief. Appellant's allegations and arguments relate to the merits of his appeals and are not properly addressed in the context of motions. The motions are denied. Appellant's pro se motions for a stay pending a ruling on his motions to dismiss are denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-25765
09/07/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Consolidating Appeals. These appeals are hereby consolidated for purposes of disposition. Nos 81887, 82756, 83029. (SC)21-25894
09/08/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Opposition to Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-26048
09/27/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Set Aside the Divorce Decree and Orders of in the Alternative to Stay Under NRS 20.0237 at a Reduced Bond for $1.00 Resulting From the Fraud by Respondent and her Attorney. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-27797
09/28/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention not to File and Serve an Opposition unless directed by the Court to do so. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC)21-27883
10/07/2021BriefFiled Proper Person Appellant's Opening Brief (Case No. 83029) Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-28807
10/07/2021Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening.(Case No. 83029) Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)
10/07/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC)21-28848
10/18/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant has filed a pro se opposition to respondent's notice of intention not to respond to certain of appellant's motions unless ordered to do so by this court. This court takes no action on the opposition. On October 7, 2021, respondent filed a notice stating that she will not be responding to appellant's October 7, 2021, opening brief (filed in Docket No. 83029) unless ordered to do so by this court. Accordingly, briefing of the appeal in Docket No. 83029 is now complete. Appellant has also filed a pro se motion to set aside the divorce decree or, alternatively, for a stay upon a reduced bond under NRS 20.037. The motion is denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC)21-29832
10/19/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to Compel Respondent to Serve a Response to Appellant's Opening Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC).21-30053
10/21/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Appellant's pro se motion to compel respondent to file an answering brief is denied at this time. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-30339
10/26/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Response to Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-30807
11/05/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant has filed a pro se response to respondent's notice of intention not to file an answering brief. He requests that this court construe the notice as a confession of error. The request is denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)21-31844
11/12/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to find Respondent's Attorney, Shawn B. Meador, in Contempt for Fabricating Evidence; for Forging Orders in Violation of NRS 205.090; and a Request that the Court Order a Criminal Investigation into Shawn B. Meador's Actions in this Divorce. Nos. 82756/81887/83029 (SC) (TRANSFERRED TO THE COURT OF APPEALS PER 11/16/21 NOTICE)21-32545
11/16/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Transfer Case to Court of Appeals. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC).21-32905
11/16/2021Case Status UpdateTransferred from Supreme Court. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA).
11/16/2021Case Status UpdateTransferred to Court of Appeals. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC).
11/16/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Appellant's Motion to find Respondent's Attorney, Shawn B. Meador, in Contempt for Fabricating Evidence; for Forging Orders in Violation of NRS 205.090; and a Request that the Court Order a Criminal Investigation into Shawn B. Meador's Actions in this Divorce. Nos. 82756/81887/83029 (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 11/16/21 NOTICE) (COA).21-32906
11/16/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention to Not File an Opposition. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC)21-32931
11/29/2021MotionFiled Appellant's Expanded Motion to Find Respondent's Attorneys, including Shawn B. Meador, in Contempt for Fabricating Evidence; for Forging Orders in Violation of NRS 205.090; and a Request that the Court Find that Shawn B. Meador committed Class D Felonies under NRS 193.130, as provided by NRS 205.090, for each Falsification, and Class B Felonies under NRS 205.300; and Order a Criminal Investigation into the Attorneys' Actions in this Divorce. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-33963
11/30/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention to Not File an Opposition. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-34148
12/06/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Motion for a Stay and Motion to Stay Appellant Requirement to Furnish a Security Bond as Provided by 9(A), 61(D) & Nevada Rev Stat 20.037(4). Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-34749
12/06/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Notice. Request for Status and to Submit for Decision on Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-34750
12/06/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motions. Appellant has filed a pro se motion and an expanded motion asking this court to (1) find respondent's attorneys in contempt for fabricating evidence and forging orders, (2) find that respondent and her attorneys have committed crimes, and (3) order a criminal investigation into the actions of respondent and her counsel. The motions are denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-34776
12/08/2021MotionFiled Respondent's Opposition to Motion for a Stay. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA21-34967
12/17/2021MotionFiled Proper Person Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Motions Filed by the December 6, 2021, and Order Respondent to Respond to Appellant's Expanded Motion to Find Respondent's Attorneys, Including Shawn B. Meador, in Contempt. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-36061
12/21/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)21-36344
01/03/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Response to Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-00152
01/06/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motions. Appellant has now filed a pro se motion asking that this court direct respondent and her counsel to respond to the expanded motion and reconsider the original motion after the response is filed. No cause appearing, the motion is denied. Appellant has also filed a pro se motion to "set the bond at zero or in the alternative at a reduced amount as provided by NRS 20.037(4), preferably $1.00." Respondent opposes the motion and asks that this court require appellant to pay the attorney fees she incurred in this matter. The motion is denied. Respondent's request for attorney fees is also denied at this time. Finally, appellant has filed a pro se request for status and to submit for decision an emergency petition for a writ of mandamus filed in October 2021. This court takes no action on the pro se request filed on December 6, 2021. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-00569
03/09/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Full Briefing. Respondent's Answering Brief due: 30 days. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of service of the answering brief to file and serve any reply brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-07470
03/30/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Request for Expedited Relief; Request to Supplement the Record. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-09947
04/04/2022Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Respondent's answering brief due: April 22, 2022. (SC)22-10324
04/04/2022MotionFiled Proper Person Motion for Sanctions for Respondent's Request for Expedited Relief; Request to Supplement Record. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-10380
04/08/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-10994
04/13/2022MotionFiled Proper Person Motion for Expedited Relief; Motion to Reconsider and Rule on All Previous Pleadings as a Result of am Incomplete Record. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-11721
04/14/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-11796
04/20/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Respondent has filed a motion to supplement the record. Appellant does not oppose the motion but asks that respondent be sanctioned for the delay in filing the motion. Counsel for respondent is admonished for delaying in filing the motion until just before her brief was due. This court declines to impose any additional sanctions related to the motion. The clerk of the district court shall have 7 days from the date of this order to transmit to this court the transcripts of proceedings held on August 18, 19, and 20, 2021, and March 31, 2021, as an additional volume of the record on appeal. Appellant has also filed a pro se motion asking that this court reconsider several motions and writ petitions in conjunction with the transcripts to be transmitted. The motion is denied. Nos. 81887/82756/73029. (COA)22-12561
04/21/2022BriefFiled Respondent's Answering Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 4/22/22) (COA)
04/22/2022Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Rejection of Deficient Brief. Corrected brief due: 5 days. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12774
04/25/2022BriefFiled Respondent's Answering Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12900
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume II. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 4/25/22) (SC)
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume II. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12903
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume III. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12908
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume IV. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12909
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume V. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12912
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume VI. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12913
04/25/2022Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC)22-12927
04/25/2022AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix, Volume I. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-12928
04/26/2022Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Telephonic Extension. Appellant's Reply Brief due: May 24, 2022. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-13175
04/28/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion. Objection to Notice of Rejection of Deficient Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-13537
04/28/2022Filing FeeReturned Filing Fee. Check No. 235 in the amount of $150.00 returned to Raymond Max Snyder. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)
04/28/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion for Reconsideration of Court of Appeals Orders. (Appellant's Petition for Review) Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-13563
04/29/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention Re: Petition for Review. Nos 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-13640
04/29/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention Re: Objection to Notice of Rejection of Deficient Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-13642
04/29/2022MotionFiled Proper Person Motion to Disallow Answering Brief Filed on April 25th, 2022. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-13753
05/05/2022MotionFiled Respondent's Objection to Appellant's Motion to Disallow Respondent Lauara Snyder's Answering Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-14393
05/06/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant has filed a pro se objection to the clerk's notice, requesting that the answering brief be rejected. This court declines to reject the answering brief, or award any other relief, based on the clerk's notice. Appellant has also filed a pro se motion to disallow respondent's answering brief. The motion to disallow the answering brief is denied. Appellant has filed a pro se petition for review of this court's April 20, 2022, order. The petition, which was filed in this court, is treated as a motion for reconsideration and denied. The district court clerk is no longer required to transmit the transcripts as directed in this court's April 20, 2022, order. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)22-14571
05/10/2022BriefFiled Appellant's Proper Person Reply Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-14845
05/10/2022Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)
05/13/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion to Have His Answering Brief's Appendix Allowed. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-15296
05/13/2022Filing FeeReturned Filing Fee. Check No. 281 in the amount of $150.00, returned to Raymond Max Snyder. (COA)
05/13/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion for Reconsideration. (Appellant's Second Petition for Review) Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-15306
05/18/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Intention Re Petition. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-15676
05/18/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Intention Re Motion. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-15681
05/18/2022OtherReturned Unfiled Document to Appellant. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (Inadvertently issued letter returning documents unfiled - see motion filed on 5/13/22) (COA)
05/24/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Proper Person Request to Use the Appendix from Appellant's Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or in the Alternative Prohibition Pursuant to NRAP 21 and 27(e), in Appellant's Response to Respondent's Answering Brief. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-16537
05/24/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention, re: request to use appendix. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-16550
05/26/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Regarding Motions. Appellant has filed a pro se motion that appears to seek leave to file an appendix to his reply brief, as well as a motion seeking leave to use an appendix filed in a separate matter. The clerk shall file the transcripts included in volumes I-IV of appellant's appendix, received on May 19, 2022. The clerk shall return the remainder of the proposed appendix unfiled. Appellant's motion to use an appendix filed in another matter is denied. Appellant has filed a document titled "Petition for Review," in which he seeks review of this court's May 6, 2022, order. No cause appearing, the motion is denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-16734
05/26/2022TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: Vol I-IV. (SC)
05/27/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion Requesting for this Court to Initiate a Criminal Investigation with Federal Law Enforcement. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-16946
05/31/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention to not file an opposition to Appellant's Motion Request for Court to Initiate Criminal Investigation. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-17119
06/08/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion to Have Respondent's Attorneys Representation Terminated Pursuant to Nev. R. Prof. Cond. 1.16(a), 1.16(a)(1), 1.16(a)(2) and 1.16(a)(3). Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-18290
06/09/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-18375
06/09/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Appellant's pro se motion asking that this court order an investigation by federal law enforcement is denied. Appellant's request that this court grant the relief requested in the original petition for a writ of mandamus in Docket No. 84730-COA is improperly made in the context of the motion and is also denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-18400
06/09/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Amended Motion to Have Respondent's Attorneys Representation Terminated Pursuant to Nev. R. Prof. Cond. 1.16(a), 1.16(a)(1), 1.16(b)(2), 1.16(b)(3) and 1.16(b)(7). Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-18414
06/10/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-18481
06/30/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motions. Appellant, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a motion and an amended motion "to have respondent's attorneys representation terminated" based on alleged violations of rules of professional conduct. No cause appearing, the motions are denied. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)22-20764
07/07/2022Filing FeeReturned Filing Fee. Check No. 237 in the amount of $150.00, returned to Raymond Max Snyder. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)
07/07/2022MotionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Motion for Reconsideration. (Appellant's Petition for Review) Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-21451
07/08/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Intention. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 7/8/2) (SC)
07/08/2022Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (SC)22-21555
07/08/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Intention. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-21566
08/26/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Appellant has filed a pro se motion for reconsideration in which he appears to challenge this court's June 30, 2022, and May 26, 2022, orders. The motion is denied. fn1 [The document is titled as a petition for review and captioned as if filed in the Supreme Court. However, a petition for review is not available with respect to non-dispositional orders issued by this court. Accordingly, the document was filed in this court and is treated as a motion for reconsideration.] Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (COA)22-26789
10/20/2022Order/DispositionalFiled Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding (Docket No. 81887-COA) and Dismissing Appeals (Docket No. 82756-COA and Docket No. 83029-COA). "Docket No. 81887-COA, We conclude that the district court's decision on the improvements issue was not supported by substantial evidence, see Williams, 120 Nev. at 566, 97 P.3d at 1129, and we therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings on the issue. We reverse the divorce decree insofar as it failed to (1) allocate the outstanding portion of the loans, which the parties made to the businesses from their community funds, between the parties; (2) evaluate whether the community was entitled to reimbursement for any community funds expended on one of the business's legal expenses; and (3) determine whether the transfers of funds from the businesses to the parties' joint accounts were loans, and if so, how those debts should be allocated between the parties. We also reverse the portions of the divorce decree addressing (1) the purported improvements to Raymond's home, (2) characterizing the funds in Raymond's bank account that he received through workers' compensation as community property, (3) directing the parties' to equally split their 401K and IRA accounts, and (4) awarding attorney fees to Lauara. On remand, the district court shall address these issues in a manner consistent with this order. We affirm all other aspects of the divorce decree. Thus, because no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from any portion of the March 31 order, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal in Docket No. 82756-COA, and it is therefore dismissed. Because this court therefore lacks jurisdiction over Raymond's appeal in Docket No. 83029-COA, it is dismissed." COA-MG/JT/BB Nos. 81887/82756/83029 (COA)22-32996
10/20/2022Order/DispositionalFiled Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding (Docket No. 81887-COA) and Dismissing Appeals (Docket No. 82756-COA and Docket No. 83029-COA). "Docket No. 81887-COA, We conclude that the district court's decision on the improvements issue was not supported by substantial evidence, see Williams, 120 Nev. at 566, 97 P.3d at 1129, and we therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings on the issue. We reverse the divorce decree insofar as it failed to (1) allocate the outstanding portion of the loans, which the parties made to the businesses from their community funds, between the parties; (2) evaluate whether the community was entitled to reimbursement for any community funds expended on one of the business's legal expenses; and (3) determine whether the transfers of funds from the businesses to the parties' joint accounts were loans, and if so, how those debts should be allocated between the parties. We also reverse the portions of the divorce decree addressing (1) the purported improvements to Raymond's home, (2) characterizing the funds in Raymond's bank account that he received through workers' compensation as community property, (3) directing the parties' to equally split their 401K and IRA accounts, and (4) awarding attorney fees to Lauara. On remand, the district court shall address these issues in a manner consistent with this order. We affirm all other aspects of the divorce decree. Thus, because no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from any portion of the March 31 order, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal in Docket No. 82756-COA, and it is therefore dismissed. Because this court therefore lacks jurisdiction over Raymond's appeal in Docket No. 83029-COA, it is dismissed." COA-MG/JT/BB Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)
11/02/2022Case Status UpdateTransferred to Supreme Court. (COA)
11/02/2022Case Status UpdateTransferred from Court of Appeals. (SC)
11/02/2022Case Status UpdateCase Closed. (COA)
11/02/2022Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Appellant's Proper Person Petition for Review. (SC)22-34612
11/02/2022Filing FeeReturned Filing Fee. Check amount: $250, returned to Appellant Raymond Max Snyder.
11/21/2022Post-Judgment Order/DispositionalOrder Denying Petition for Review. "Review Denied" Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)22-36534
11/21/2022RemittiturIssued Remittitur. NOS. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)22-36539
11/21/2022Case Status UpdateRemittitur Issued/Case Closed NOS. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)
12/15/2022RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 28, 2022. Nos. 81887/82756/83029. (SC)22-36539