Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
NOTICE: We have moved the Case search portal to the following site. Please use the link below to access the new portal.

https://acis.nvcourts.gov/portal/home

For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Combined Case Information: 86191-COA & 86191
Short Caption:ELMORE VS. HERRIN (CHILD CUSTODY)Court:Court of Appeals & Supreme Court
Related Case(s):86191
Lower Court Case(s):Churchill Co. - Tenth Judicial District - 22-10DC-0667Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Pro Bono Program/Child Custody
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:01/25/2024 at 1:30 PMOral Argument Location:Las Vegas
Submission Date:01/25/2024How Submitted:
Expedited

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/06/2023Filing FeeFiling Fee Paid. Money Order for $250.00 from Heavenly Elmore. Money Order No. 22-003754740. (SC)
03/06/2023Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)23-06664
03/06/2023Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Regarding Deadlines/Fast Track Child Custody. (SC)23-06669
03/20/2023Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 10/31/22, 01/26/23. To Court Reporter: none listed. (SC).23-08543
03/28/2023Docketing StatementFiled Proper Person Docketing Statement Civil Appeals. (SC).23-09418
03/31/2023Order/ProceduralFiled Order Regarding Pro Bono Counsel and Directing Transmission of Record. Counsel will be appointed for purposes of this appeal only and will participate in oral argument. This case is hereby referred to the program established by the Pro Bono Committee to evaluate whether appellant and/or respondent can benefit from the program. Accordingly, the clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order and the attached case summary to the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada for financial eligibility screening. If appellant and/or respondent qualifies and does not object to pro bono counsel, the Legal Aid Center in cooperation with the Pro Bono Committee shall locate a volunteer attorney from the program to represent appellant and/or respondent. Once an attorney is located, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance in this court within 60 days from the date of this order. Briefing and oral argument will be scheduled thereafter. Alternatively, if appellant and/or respondent is not financially eligible or objects to pro bono representation, or if a volunteer attorney cannot be located, the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada shall notify this court in writing within 60 days from the date of this order. In such case, oral argument will not be held. The deadlines for filing documents in this appeal shall be suspended pending further order of this court. This court has further concluded that review of the complete record is warranted. Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this order, the clerk of the district court shall transmit to the clerk of this court a certified copy of the trial court record in District Court Case No. 22-10DC-0667. (SC)23-09934
04/05/2023Fast Track BriefFiled Appellant's Pro Se Child Custody Fast Track Statement. (SC)23-10445
04/18/2023Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Record on Appeal Case No. 22-10DC-0667. (SC)23-11910
04/19/2023Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled SEALED District Court Documents. Document: General Financial Disclosures. Dates: 07/25/22, 08/29/22, and 11/10/22. (SC)
05/01/2023Fast Track BriefFiled Respondent's Fast Track Response. (SC)23-13537
05/26/2023MotionFiled Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada's Motion to Extend Time - Notice to the Court Regarding Eligibility and Pro Bono Counsel. (SC)23-16719
06/01/2023Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel for Christopher P. Burke. (SC)23-17244
06/01/2023Notice/IncomingFiled Appellant's Notice of Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel for Joel E. Tasca. (SC)23-17248
06/05/2023Order/ProceduralFiled Order Reinstating Briefing. Attorney Joel E. Tasca of Ballard Spahr, LLP has filed a notice of appearance as appellant's pro bono counsel, and attorney Christopher P. Burke of the Law Office of Christopher P. Burke has filed a notice of appearance as respondent's pro bono counsel. Accordingly, this court sets forth the following schedule for the requesting of transcripts and briefing in this appeal. Appellant shall have 14 days from the date of this order to determine the transcripts necessary for a review of this appeal and to file either a transcript request form or a certification that no transcripts are requested under NRAP 9(a). As appellant is now a client of a program for legal aid, see NRS 12.015(1)(b), appellant's counsel is directed to follow NRS 12.015(3) for obtaining any necessary transcripts at county expense. Appellant shall have 90 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief. See NRAP 28; NRAP 30; NRAP 31(a)(2). Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(2). fn1[The Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada's motion for an extension of time to allow counsel to file a notice of appearance is granted.] (SC)23-17604
06/20/2023Notice/IncomingFiled Appellant's Notice of Transcript Request. (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED 6/21/23) (SC)
06/21/2023Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Rejection of Deficient Transcript Request. (SC)23-19559
06/29/2023Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 10/31/22 and 01/26/23. To Court Reporter: JAVS Audio-Video. (SC)23-20801
06/29/2023MotionFiled Appellant's Motion to Extend Time to File Transcript Request Form. (SC)23-20803
07/10/2023Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the transcript request form is granted. The transcript request form was filed on June 29, 2023. (SC)23-21922
08/31/2023Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's opening brief due: September 19, 2023. (SC)23-28569
09/19/2023BriefFiled Appellant's Opening Brief. (SC)23-30734
09/19/2023AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. (SC)23-30735
10/11/2023Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Respondent's answering brief due: October 24, 2023. (SC)23-33130
10/18/2023BriefFiled Respondent's Answering Brief. (SC)23-33932
11/08/2023BriefFiled Appellant's Reply Brief. (SC)23-36483
11/09/2023Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening. (SC)
11/27/2023Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Transfer Case to Court of Appeals. (SC).23-38251
11/27/2023Case Status UpdateTransferred from Supreme Court. (COA).
11/27/2023Case Status UpdateTransferred to Court of Appeals. (SC).
12/04/2023Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This matter is scheduled for oral argument on January 25, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. in Las Vegas. The argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. (COA)23-39234
01/18/2024Notice/IncomingFiled Appellant's Notice of Appearance for Madeleine Coles for Oral Argument. (COA)24-01977
01/19/2024Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Notice of Appearance for Christopher Burke for Oral Argument. (COA)24-02061
01/25/2024Case Status UpdateOral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the Court of Appeals. (COA)
01/30/2024Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Reversal and Remand. "ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND." fn3[Pending further proceedings on remand, we leave in place the current custody arrangement. See Davis, 131 Nev. at 455, 352 P.3d at 1146 (leaving certain provisions of a custody order in place pending further proceedings on remand). To the extent that Elmore requested at oral argument that we order the district court to hold a new evidentiary hearing prior to making its findings, we conclude that the district court will have discretion to determine if such a hearing is necessary on remand.] COA-MG/BB/DW (COA)24-03465
01/30/2024Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Reversal and Remand. "ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND." fn3[Pending further proceedings on remand, we leave in place the current custody arrangement. See Davis, 131 Nev. at 455, 352 P.3d at 1146 (leaving certain provisions of a custody order in place pending further proceedings on remand). To the extent that Elmore requested at oral argument that we order the district court to hold a new evidentiary hearing prior to making its findings, we conclude that the district court will have discretion to determine if such a hearing is necessary on remand.] COA-MG/BB/DW (SC)
02/26/2024Case Status UpdateTransferred to Supreme Court.(COA)
02/26/2024Case Status UpdateTransferred from Court of Appeals.(SC)
02/26/2024Case Status UpdateCase Closed.(COA)
02/26/2024RemittiturIssued Remittitur.(SC)24-06778
02/26/2024Case Status UpdateRemittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)
03/13/2024RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on 03/01/24. (SC)24-06778