Combined Case Information: 89473
Short Caption:	TAVARES VS. BUONOCORE (CHILD CUSTODY)	Court:	Supreme Court
		Related Case(s):	88042, 88218, 88218-COA, 88561, 88561-COA, 89316
Lower Court Case(s):	Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D623170	Classification:	Civil Appeal - Family Law - Fast Track Child Custody
Disqualifications:		Case Status:	Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:		Panel Assigned:	Panel
To SP/Judge:		SP Status:
Oral Argument:		Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:		How Submitted:
	Expedited

+ Party Information
Role	Party Name	Represented By
Appellant	Edgar Tavares	Emily M. McFarling (McFarling Law Group)
Respondent	Jenny Buonocore	Jeffrey S. Posin (Posin Law Group, PC) Michael J. Warhola (Michael J. Warhola, LLC)

Docket Entries
Date	Type	Description	Pending?	Document
10/14/2024	Filing Fee	Filing Fee due for Appeal. (SC)
10/14/2024	Notice of Appeal Documents	Filed SEALED Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Filed certified copy of notice of appeal. (SC)
10/14/2024	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 7 days. (SC)		24-38605
10/14/2024	Filing Fee	E-Payment $250.00 from Emily M. McFarling. (SC)
10/15/2024	Notice/Incoming	Filed Respondent's Notice of Association of Counsel for Jeffrey Posin. (SC)		24-38788
10/17/2024	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice Appeal Docketed FTCC. Appeal Docketed-NRAP 3E. Rough draft transcript request due: 14 days; Docketing statement due: 21 days; Fast track opening brief due: 60 days. (SC)		24-39159
10/31/2024	Transcript Request	Filed Appellant's Certificate of No Transcript Request. (SC)		24-41093
10/31/2024	Transcript Request	Filed Respondent's Certificate of No Transcript Request. (SC)		24-41178
11/06/2024	Docketing Statement	Filed Appellant's Docketing Statement Civil. (SC)		24-42016
12/09/2024	Order/Procedural	Filed Order to Show Cause. Appellant shall have 28 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent may file any reply within 14 days from the date that appellant's response is served. Briefing is suspended. (SC)		24-46875
12/11/2024	Motion	Filed Appellant's Motion to Consolidate Child Custody Appeals (Case Nos. 88561/89473). (SC)		24-47341
12/30/2024	Motion	Filed Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. (SC)		24-50188
12/30/2024	Appendix	Filed Appellant's Exhibits to Response to Order to Show Cause. (SC)		24-50190
01/13/2025	Motion	Filed Respondent's Reply to Opposition to Order to Show Cause. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 1/14/25)(SC)
01/14/2025	Order/Procedural	Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Reply to Order to Show Cause. Corrected Reply due: 7 days from the date of this order. (SC)		25-01885
01/15/2025	Motion	Filed Respondent's Revised Reply to Appellant's Opposition to Order to Show Cause. (SC)		25-02117
03/10/2025	Order/Dispositional	Filed Order Dismissing Appeal (Docket No. 89473) and Denying Motions to Consolidate. When this court's review of the docketing statement and other documents before the court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect regarding the appeal in Docket No. 89473, appellant was directed to show cause why that appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant and respondent timely filed responses to the show cause order. Appellant asserts that the appeal should not be dismissed because the district court exceeded the scope of its authority under NRCP 60(a), and thus the limited remand was ineffective. However, these are merits arguments and do not demonstrate this court's jurisdiction over the September 5 order. Respondent asserts that the appeal should be dismissed. As appellant has failed to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the September 5 indicative order, the appeal in Docket No. 89473 is hereby dismissed. The appeal in Docket No. 88561 remains pending, with the fast track opening brief due on March 14, 2025, and appellant may raise any issues he has with the September 5 and November 4 orders in that appeal. In light of this order, the motions to consolidate these appeals are denied as moot. A25-RP/LB/LS (SC)		25-10920
03/31/2025	Remittitur	Issued Remittitur.(SC)		25-14379
03/31/2025	Case Status Update	Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)
04/11/2025	Remittitur	Filed Remittitur. Received by District Court clerk on 4/1/25. (SC)		25-14379