Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 60014
Short Caption:RANDOLPH (THOMAS) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s):59754, 73825, 87127
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C250966Classification:Original Proceeding - Criminal - Mandamus
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
01/10/2012Filing FeeFiling Fee Waived. Criminal.
01/10/2012Petition/WritFiled Petition for Emergency Writ of Mandamus. Emergency Review Requested (Trial set to begin January 17, 2012). Exhibits attached. (EXHIBIT B - SEALED)12-00906
01/11/2012Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Answer and Supplement to Petition. Answer due: 10 days. Petitioner: Supplement to the petition due: 5 days.12-01046
01/18/2012Petition/WritFiled Supplement to Petition for Writ.12-01712
01/20/2012Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Emergency Writ of Mandamus.12-02151
01/24/2012Order/ProceduralFiled Order to Show Cause. Petitioner shall have 5 days from the date of this order to show cause why this petition should not be dismissed as moot.12-02508
01/31/2012Petition/WritFiled Reply in Support of Emergency Writ of Mandamus and Answer to Order to Show Cause.12-03319
02/01/2012Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Petition. We dismiss this petition as moot because the district court vacated the trial date and petitioner therefore has the opportunity to file a timely request to discharge retained counsel and appoint substitute counsel should he wish to do so.12-03542
02/01/2012Case Status UpdateCase Closed/No Remittitur Issued.
Combined Case View