Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 69580
Short Caption:HAIRR VS. DIST. CT. (LOPEZ)Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s):69611
Lower Court Case(s):Carson City - First Judicial District - 15OC002071BClassification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
01/14/2016Filing FeeFiling fee paid. E-Payment $250.00 from Lisa J. Zastrow.
01/14/2016Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e). Action Requested by January 27, 2016.16-01278
01/14/2016AppendixFiled Appendix to Petition for Writ - Volume 1.16-01279
01/14/2016AppendixFiled Appendix to Petition for Writ - Volume 2.16-01280
01/14/2016AppendixFiled Appendix to Petition for Writ - Volume 3.16-01281
01/15/2016Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Answer Having reviewed the petition, it appears that an answer may assist this court in resolving this matter. Real Parties in Interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have until 4:00 p.m. on Friday, January 22, 2016, to file and serve an answer. Petitioner shall have until 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 27, 2016, to file and serve any reply to the answer. fn1[We suspend application of NRAP 25(a)(2)(B)(ii)-(iv). All documents in this matter shall be filed personally, electronically, or by facsimile transmission with the clerk of this court in Carson City. In addition, service of all documents shall be personal, electronic, or by facsimile transmission.]16-01501
01/22/2016Petition/WritFiled Treasurer Dan Schwartz's Notice of Non-Opposition (Answer to Petition for Writ).16-02371
01/22/2016Petition/WritFiled Plaintiffs / Real Parties In Interest's Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus.16-02375
01/28/2016Petition/WritFiled Petitioners Aimee Hairr, Aurora Espinoza, Elizabeth Robbins, Lara Allen, Jeffrey Smith, And Trina Smiths Reply In Support Of Their Petition For Writ Of Mandamus.16-02927
03/10/2016Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. "Petition denied." Before: Hardesty/Saitta/Pickering. Author: Hardesty. Majority: Hardesty/Saitta/Pickering. 132 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 16. SNP16-JM/NS/KP16-07625
03/15/2016Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Reconsideration of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the First Judicial District Court, District Court Case No. 15-OC-002071-B (Petition for Rehearing).16-08116
03/15/2016Filing FeeFiling fee paid. E-Payment $150.00 from Lisa J. Zastrow.
03/16/2016Notice/IncomingFiled Errata to Petition for Reconsideration of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the First Judicial District Court, District Court Case No. 15-OC-002071-B16-08353
05/10/2016Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c).16-14570
05/12/2016Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter (dated 5/3/16) to Publishers with corrections to recently filed opinions. Nos. 65424/66816/67465/53626/62493/69580/65681/66473 (Letter entered in Docket No. 65424 as document no. 16-14923.)
05/13/2016Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance and Request for Pleadings. Joshua A. House, Esq. of Institute for Justice enters his appearance as counsel for Parent-Interveners Aimee Hairr, Aurora Espinoza, Elizabeth Robbins, Lara Allen, Jeffrey Smith and Trina Smith.16-15153
05/16/2016Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Reconsideration of Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the First Judicial District Court, District Court Case No. 15-OC-002071-B (Petition for En Banc Reconsideration).16-15166
06/13/2016MotionFiled Motion requesting permission to have a video and a still camera in the courtroom during July 8, 2016 oral argument. (Schwartz vs. Lopez)
06/24/2016Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC16-19833
07/19/2016RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu/Rehearing.16-22448
07/19/2016Case Status UpdateNotice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
Combined Case View