Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 62797-COA
Short Caption:VAILE VS. VAILE C/W 61415Court:Court of Appeals
Consolidated:61415-COA*, 62797-COARelated Case(s):36969, 37082, 51981, 52244, 52457, 52593, 53687, 53798, 55396, 55446, 55911, 60502, 61321, 61415, 61415-COA, 61626, 62797, 68715, 77070
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D230385Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:01/06/2015How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
01/06/2015Case Status UpdateTransferred from Supreme Court.
01/06/2015Case Status UpdateSubmitted for Decision.
02/04/2015Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Response. Respondents: Response due: 30 days. Respondent's Response shall not exceed 30 pages plus the attorney's certificate. Respondent's Response may cite to either the record on appeal or any appendix filed with the response. Nos. 61415/62797. (15-900097).
03/06/2015BriefFiled Response to Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. Nos. 61415/62797 (15-900235)
12/29/2015Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. . Order Affirming in Part, Dismissing in Part, Reversing in Part, and Remanding. "We affirm the district court's conclusion that the Nevada divorce decree was the controlling child support order under UIFSA; its decisions to not apply judicial estoppel, waiver, or prevention; and its determination that the awards of attorney fees made prior to Vaile II remained valid. And we reverse that portion of the district court's order calculating child support arrearages as well as the resulting penalties and interest based on the arrearages calculations and remand for further proceedings consistent with this order. We likewise reverse and remand with regard to the award of $57,483.38 in post-Vaile II attorney fees, but affirm the $20,000 award of attorney fees based on Vaile's failure to appear at a hearing. Finally, we dismiss Vaile's appeals for lack of jurisdiction to the extent he challenges the district court's contempt determinations and the imposition of sanctions based on those determinations." fn16[In light of this order, we deny as moot any remaining requests for relief pending in these consolidated appeals.] Court of Appeals-MG/JT/AS Nos. 61415/62797.15-901689
04/14/2016Post-Judgment Order/DispositionalOrder Granting Rehearing. in Part, Denying Rehearing in Part, and Affirming. Nos. 61415/62797 (16-900427).
05/04/2016Case Status UpdateTransferred to Supreme Court. Nos. 61415/62797
05/04/2016Case Status UpdateCase Closed. Nos. 61415/62797