Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 80072-COA
Short Caption:APARICIO (HENRY) VS. STATECourt:Court of Appeals
Related Case(s):80072, 84300, 84300-COA
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C332496Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Direct
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:09/29/2020 at 1:30 PMOral Argument Location:Las Vegas
Submission Date:09/29/2020How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
05/29/2020Case Status UpdateTransferred from Supreme Court. (COA)
07/28/2020Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This matter is scheduled for oral argument on September 29, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. Argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. Oral argument will be held in Las Vegas or by videoconference, depending on current public health conditions. The Clerk of the Court will notify the parties by September 15, 2020, as to whether the argument will be in person or conducted via videoconference. On or before August 10, the parties shall submit to the Clerk of the Court a notice identifying the attorney(s) who will argue the case and the landline and cellular phone numbers and email address of that attorney(s). The notice may be emailed to the court at nvscclerk@nvcourts.nv.gov. fn1[The court will use the BlueJeans videoconferencing system, which requires laptop/desktop/videoconferencing computer internet access and audio and video (web camera) capability. If argument is conducted by videoconference, the attorneys will be required to schedule a session with the Clerk of the Court to test the capabilities of the connection and video equipment approximately one week prior to argument.] (COA)20-27401
09/15/2020Order/ProceduralFiled Order Regarding Videoconference Oral Argument. This case is currently scheduled for oral argument on September 29, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. Oral argument will be held by videoconference. The court will use the BlueJeans videoconferencing system, which requires laptop/desktop/videoconferencing computer internet access and audio and video (web camera) capability. In case technical difficulties develop at any time, the court will conduct the oral argument by teleconference, which will require counsel to have immediate access to a landline phone connection. The attorneys will be required to schedule a session with the Clerk of the Court to test the capabilities of the connection and video equipment approximately one week prior to argument. (COA)20-33928
09/29/2020Case Status UpdateOral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the Court of Appeals. (COA).
12/31/2020Order/DispositionalFiled Order Vacating Sentence and Remanding. We "VACATE Aparicio's sentence and ORDER this matter REMANDED to the district court for resentencing before a different judge." Tao, J., dissenting. Court of Appeals- MG/JT/BB. (COA)20-47057
01/07/2021Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Respondent's Petition for Rehearing. (COA)21-00420
01/07/2021Filing FeeRehearing Filing fee waived. (COA)
02/17/2021Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). (COA).21-04677
03/03/2021Case Status UpdateTransferred to Supreme Court. (COA)
03/03/2021Case Status UpdateCase Closed. (COA)
Combined Case View