Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 84328
Short Caption:LEE (MICHAEL) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s):66963, 74089, 76330, 85004
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C277650Classification:Original Proceeding - Criminal - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/04/2022Filing FeePetition Filing Fee Waived. Criminal. (SC)
03/04/2022Petition/WritFiled Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition. (SC)22-06929
03/04/2022AppendixFiled Appendix to Petition for Writ. (SC)22-06930
03/08/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Written Order and Expedited Answer. Petitioner shall have until noon tomorrow, March 9, 2022, to file and serve a supplemental appendix including a file-stamped copy of the district court's written order. Real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have until 4 p.m. on Thursday, March 10, 2022, to file and serve an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. No extensions of time will be granted in this matter absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances demonstrated by written motion. (SC)22-07376
03/08/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Amended Order Directing Written Order and Expedited Answer. Petitioner shall have until noon tomorrow, March 9, 2022, to file and serve a supplemental appendix including a file-stamped copy of the district court's written order and any related transcripts. Real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have until 4 p.m. on Thursday, March 10, 2022, to file and serve an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. No extensions of time will be granted in this matter absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances demonstrated by written motion. (SC)22-07433
03/09/2022AppendixFiled Petitioner's Supplemental Appendix to Petition for Writ. (SC)22-07471
03/10/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Second Supplemental Appendix. petitioner shall have until 4 p.m. today, March 10, 2022, to file a second supplemental appendix containing copies of the file-stamped ex parte applications. Upon submission of the second supplemental appendix, the clerk of this court shall file the appendix under seal. (SC).22-07672
03/10/2022AppendixFiled Petitioner's (SEALED) Supplemental Appendix. (Via Fax) (Pages 222-262) (SC)
03/10/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Real Party in Interest's Notice of Appearance for Karen L. Mishler. (SC)22-07724
03/10/2022Petition/WritFiled Real Party in Interest's Answer to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition. (SC)22-07726
03/10/2022AppendixFiled Real Party in Interest's Appendix to Petition for Writ. (SC)22-07727
03/11/2022Order/DispositionalFiled Order Granting Petition in Part for Writ of Mandamus. "We grant the petition in part and direct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to vacate its order denying Lee's motion to disqualify the district attorney's office and to, before trial, conduct an evidentiary hearing on the matter to determine whether Lee was prejudiced by the inadvertent disclosure of his defense trial strategy. If the district court finds that no one accessed the confidential material or no prejudice resulted, trial may proceed. If, however, the district court finds that Lee was prejudiced by the disclosure, the district court must, prior to trial, tailor a remedy to neutralize the Sixth Amendment violation, which may include disqualification of the entire district attorney's office or any individuals within the office." SNP22-AS/EC/KP Pickering, J., dissenting. (SC)22-07930
03/11/2022WritIssued Writ with letter. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Attorney Kelsey L. Bernstein for service upon Judge David Barker. (SC)22-07934
03/14/2022AppendixFiled Filed Petitioner's (SEALED) Supplemental Appendix. (** ORIGINAL **) (Pages 222-262) (SC)
04/05/2022RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. (SC)22-10583
04/05/2022Case Status UpdateNotice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. (SC)
04/11/2022WritFiled Returned Writ. Original Writ returned. Served on Judge Jacqueline Bluth on March 11, 2022. (SC)22-11438