Case Information: 84255-COA
Short Caption:	CUNNING VS. CUNNING	Court:	Court of Appeals
		Related Case(s):	84255, 89716
Lower Court Case(s):	Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D602653	Classification:	Civil Appeal - Family Law - Other
Disqualifications:		Case Status:	Case Closed
Replacement:		Panel Assigned:	Panel
To SP/Judge:		SP Status:
Oral Argument:		Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:		How Submitted:

+ Party Information
Role	Party Name	Represented By
Appellant	Lisa Jeanne Messing	In Proper Person
Respondent	Charles Chris Cunning	Stewart C. Fitts (Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas) John T. Kelleher (Kelleher & Kelleher, LLC) Shannon R. Wilson (Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas)

Docket Entries
Date	Type	Description	Pending?	Document
06/30/2023	Case Status Update	Transferred from Supreme Court. (COA).
07/18/2023	Motion	Filed Appellant's Proper Person Motion to Transfer Case Back to the Supreme Court of Nevada. (COA)		23-22915
07/25/2023	Motion	Filed Respondent's Opposition to Appellant's Motion to Transfer Back to the Supreme Court of Nevada. (COA).		23-23831
07/26/2023	Notice/Incoming	Filed Respondent's Certificate of Service for Opposition to Motion. (COA)		23-23949
08/02/2023	Motion	Filed Proper Person Appellant's Reply to Response to Appellant's Motion to Transfer Case Back to the Supreme Court of Nevada. (COA).		23-24834
08/07/2023	Order/Procedural	Filed Order Denying Motion. Appellant has filed a motion to transfer this appeal back to the supreme court on the ground that it allegedly involves an amount over $250,000. The motion is denied. (COA)		23-25412
10/02/2023	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion to Accept Supplemental Authorities. (COA)		23-32222
10/09/2023	Motion	Filed Respondent's Response to Motion to Accept Supplemental Authorities. (COA)		23-32976
11/01/2023	Order/Procedural	Filed Order. Appellant has filed supplemental authorities pursuant to NRAP 31(e). This court concludes that appellant has not complied with the limitations of the rule as she identifies over two dozen cases, statutes, and other supplemental authorities that were available to her when she filed her opening brief and does not state concisely and without argument the legal proposition for which each supplemental authority is cited. Accordingly, the clerk of this court shall return, unfiled, the supplemental authorities received on October 2, 2023. (COA)		23-35521
11/08/2023	Motion	Filed Proper Person's Motion to Amend Opening Brief. (COA)		23-36422
11/15/2023	Motion	Filed Respondent's Response to Motion to Amend Opening Brief. (COA)		23-37153
11/28/2023	Motion	Filed Proper Person's Reply to Response to Motion to Amend Opening Brief. (COA)		23-38477
12/04/2023	Order/Procedural	Filed Order Denying Motion. Appellant has now filed a motion to amend her opening brief, indicating that she wishes to file a new opening brief with "concisely cited and referenced legal authorities." Although the appellate courts have occasionally permitted prompt and non-substantive amendments to briefs (such as to correct minor typographical errors), appellant has not demonstrated good cause to permit her contemplated amendment at this time. Accordingly, the motion is denied. (COA)		23-39071
05/03/2024	Order/Dispositional	Filed Order Affirming in Part and Reversing in Part. "We reverse the portion of the supplemental decree of divorce providing Chris an additional $3,500 reimbursement for the two 2000 Honda XRs awarded to him in the divorce decree and affirm the remainder of the district court's orders." COA-MG/BB/DW (COA)		24-15700
05/06/2024	Case Status Update	Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)
05/06/2024	Case Status Update	Case Closed. (COA)