Case Information: 88968-COA
Short Caption:	LAGESON VS. JARADAT, M.D. (CIVIL)	Court:	Court of Appeals
		Related Case(s):	88968
Lower Court Case(s):	Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A860880	Classification:	Civil Appeal - General - Proper Person
Disqualifications:		Case Status:	Case Closed
Replacement:		Panel Assigned:	Panel
To SP/Judge:		SP Status:
Oral Argument:		Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:		How Submitted:

+ Party Information
Role	Party Name	Represented By
Appellant	Eric Arthur Lageson	In Proper Person
Respondent	Ahmed Jaradat, M.D.	Olivia Anne Campbell (McBride Hall) Heather S. Hall (McBride Hall)
Respondent	Desert Springs Hospital Medical Center	Jill M. Chase (Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas) Michael E. Prangle (Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas)
Respondent	Gretel Fontana	Jill M. Chase (Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas) Michael E. Prangle (Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas)
Respondent	Nader Eldris, M.D.	Keith A. Weaver (Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas)

Docket Entries
Date	Type	Description	Pending?	Document
12/02/2024	Case Status Update	Transferred from Supreme Court (COA).
12/10/2024	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion for Extension of Time (Amendment to an Appeal(COA)		24-47144
12/10/2024	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion to Amend an Appeal (SC)		24-47150
12/10/2024	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion for an Extension in Time (Oral Argument)(SC)		24-47155
12/10/2024	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion for an Oral Argument(SC)		24-47156
12/23/2024	Order/Procedural	Filed Order Regarding Motions. On December 10, 2024, appellant filed a pro se "Motion to Amend an Appeal," a "Motion for an Oral Argument," as well as motions for extensions of time to file those motions. The motion to amend seeks to change appellant's response to Item 15 in the docketing statement from "no" to "yes," and add the name of the district court judge for disqualification. The motion is denied because docketing statement item 15 relates to a request to disqualify a justice of the Supreme Court or a judge of the Court of Appeals, not a district court judge. Any other relief requested in the motion is also denied. Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied at this time. In light of the foregoing, we deny the motions seeking extensions of time as moot. (COA)		24-49565
12/31/2024	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion to Amend an Appeal-Second Amendment(SC)		24-50488
12/31/2024	Motion	Filed Proper Person Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (SC)		24-50490
01/03/2025	Order/Procedural	Filed Order Denying Motions. On December 30, 2024, pro se appellant filed a "Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal" and a "Motion to Amend an Appeal?Second Amendment." As to the stay motion, appellant fails to identify any district court proceedings to stay. Thus, considering the relevant factors, we deny that request. As to the motion to amend, it contains substantive arguments in support of the relief appellant seeks on appeal. As such, we construe the motion as a supplement and this court will consider the substantive arguments within the motion when resolving this appeal. Any other relief requested in the motion to amend is denied. (COA)		25-00278
04/14/2025	Order/Dispositional	Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)		25-16830
05/05/2025	Case Status Update	Transferred to Supreme Court.(COA)
05/05/2025	Case Status Update	Case Closed.(COA)