Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 62050
Short Caption:STATE, DEPT. OF TAXATION VS. DIST. CT. (CITY OF FERNLEY)Court:Supreme Court
Related Case(s):66851
Lower Court Case(s):Carson City - First Judicial District - 12OC001681BClassification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:01/08/2013 at 11:00 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:01/08/2013How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
11/05/2012Filing FeePetition Filing fee waived. State/County/Municipality.
11/05/2012Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus.12-34941
11/05/2012AppendixFiled Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Volumes 1-6. (CD included)12-34947
11/13/2012Order/ProceduralFiled Order Directing Answer. Real party in interest shall have 20 days to file an answer. Petitioners shall have 10 days to file any reply. Petitioners shall have 5 days to file a supplement to their petition setting forth any important deadlines for the Legislature's consideration of this legislation that may be impacted by this court's resolution of the petition. No extensions of time will be granted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. Fn1[For the purpose of this petition, we suspend application of NRAP 25(a)(2)(B)(ii)-(iv), which provides that a document is timely filed if, on or before its due date, it is mailed to this court, dispatched for delivery within three calendar days by a third-party commercial carrier, or deposited in the supreme court drop box. All further documents submitted in this matter shall be filed personally, electronically, or by facsimile transmission with the clerk of this court in Carson City. In addition, service of all documents shall be personal, electronic, or by fax. Additionally, for the purpose of this petition, we suspend application of NRAP 26(b)(1)(B), which provides that the clerk of this court may grant a five-day extension of time for performing any act except the filing of a notice of appeal made through a telephonic or written request. To the extent that any party to this petition requests an extension of time to comply with any directive from this court, that request shall be made through a written motion filed with this court.]12-35792
11/16/2012Petition/WritFiled Supplement to Petition for Writ of Mandamus.12-36360
12/03/2012Petition/WritFiled Answering Brief to Petition for Writ of Mandamus.12-38073
12/04/2012AppendixFiled Respondent's Appendix.12-38080
12/04/2012Notice/IncomingFiled Errata to Respondent's Appendix.12-38107
12/18/2012Petition/WritFiled Petitioners' Reply Brief.12-39948
12/21/2012Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral argument is hereby scheduled before the en banc court on January 8, 2013, at the hour of 11:00 a.m., in Carson City.12-40418
12/21/2012Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on Tuesday, January 8, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. in Carson City.12-40452
12/21/2012Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.12-40460
01/08/2013Case Status UpdateOral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the En Banc Court.
01/25/2013Order/DispositionalFiled Order Granting Petition in Part and Denying in Part Petition for Writ of Mandamus. "ORDER the petition GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS instructing the district court to vacate the challenged order to the extent it refused to dismiss or grant summary judgment on the City's federal constitutional claims and to enter an order dismissing those claims." Saitta, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. EN BANC13-02669
01/25/2013WritIssued Writ with letter. Original and one copy of Writ and copy of Order mailed to Keven C. Powers for service upon Judge James Todd Russell.13-02689
01/29/2013WritFiled Returned Writ. Original Writ returned. Served on Judge James Todd Russell on 01/28/13.13-03036
02/19/2013RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur.13-05121
02/19/2013Case Status UpdateNotice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
Combined Case View