Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Combined Case Information: 82623 & 82623-COA
Short Caption:IN RE: ESTATE OF SARGECourt:Supreme Court & Court of Appeals
Related Case(s):73286, 82623-COA
Lower Court Case(s):Carson City - First Judicial District - 16RP000091BClassification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:Exempt
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/15/2021Filing FeeFiling Fee due for Appeal. Filing fee will be forwarded by the District Court. (SC)
03/15/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) (SC)21-07386
03/15/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. (SC)21-07388
03/15/2021Filing FeeFiling Fee Paid. $250.00 from Tory M. Pankopf. Check no. 6126. (SC)
03/16/2021Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Exemption from Settlement Program. It has been determined that this appeal will not be assigned to the settlement program. Appellants:14 days transcript request form; 120 days opening brief. (SC)21-07540
03/16/2021Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement Civil Appeals. (SC)21-07564
03/19/2021MotionFiled Appellants' Motion to Stay Order Pending Appeal. (SC)21-08025
03/26/2021MotionFiled Respondents' Opposition to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (SC)21-08646
03/26/2021MotionFiled Appellants' Reply to Opposition to Motion to Stay Order Pending Appeal. (SC)21-08696
04/01/2021Transcript RequestFiled Appellants' Certificate of No Transcript Request. (SC)21-09475
04/14/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Copy of District Court Docket Entries. (SC)21-10789
05/26/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Stay. Appellants have moved to stay the district court order appealed from pending resolution of this appeal. Respondents oppose the motion, and appellants have filed a reply. This court concludes that a stay is warranted. The district court's order shall be stayed pending further order of this court. (SC)21-15067
06/01/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Copy of District Court Docket Entries. (SC)21-15486
07/14/2021Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Telephonic Extension. Appellant's Opening Brief and Appendix due: July 28, 2021. (SC)21-20245
07/28/2021BriefFiled Appellants' Opening Brief. (SC)21-21936
07/28/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Excerpts of Record - Volumes I and II. (SC)21-21944
08/23/2021Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Telephonic Extension. Respondents' Answering Brief due: September 10, 2021. (SC)21-24431
09/09/2021MotionFiled Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Responding Brief. (SC)21-26144
09/09/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance (Patrick R. Millsap, Esq. F. McClure Wallace, Esq. of Wallace and Millsap LLC, hereby enter their appearance as co-counsel with James M. Walsh Walsh & Rosevear as counsel for Respondents). (SC)21-26149
09/15/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Pursuant to the notice of appearance filed on September 9, 2021, the clerk of this court shall add attorneys Patrick R. Millsap, F. McClure Wallace, and the law firm of Wallace and Millsap LLC to the docket of this appeal as counsel for respondents. Respondents' motion requesting a second extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. Respondents' answering brief due: October 8, 2021. (SC)21-26686
10/08/2021BriefFiled Respondents' Answering Brief. (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 10/8/21) (SC)
10/08/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Deficient Brief. Corrected brief due: 5 days. (SC)21-28962
10/08/2021BriefFiled Respondents' Answering Brief. (SC)21-28981
11/09/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Copy of District Court Docket Entries. (SC)21-32170
12/01/2021Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening. (SC)
12/07/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Copy of District Court Docket Entries. (Updated docket sheet) (SC)21-34929
12/29/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Transfer Case to Court of Appeals. (SC).21-36941
12/29/2021Case Status UpdateTransferred to Court of Appeals. (SC).
12/29/2021Case Status UpdateTransferred from Supreme Court. (COA).
01/10/2022Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Docket Entries. (COA)22-00855
01/24/2022Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Docket Entries. (SC)22-02404
01/27/2022Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Docket Entries. (COA)22-02759
02/08/2022Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Minutes. (SC)22-04318
03/11/2022Order/DispositionalFiled Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "we affirm the district court's order insofar as it determined that the Pedersons are protected as BFPs to the extent the underlying action is based on alleged violations of NRS 107.550. However, we reverse the district court's order insofar as it determined that the Pedersons are protected as BFPs from the Sarges' efforts to have the foreclosure sale declared void under NRS 107.080, and we remand for further proceedings consistent with our disposition." Court of Appeals-MG/JT/BB (COA)22-07904
03/11/2022Order/DispositionalFiled Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "We affirm the district court's order insofar as it determined that the Pedersons are protected as BFPs to the extent the underlying action is based on alleged violations of NRS 107.550. However, we reverse the district court's order insofar as it determined that the Pedersons are protected as BFPs from the Sarges' efforts to have the foreclosure sale declared void under NRS 107.080, and we remand for further proceedings consistent with our disposition." Court of Appeals-MG/JT/BB (SC)
04/05/2022Case Status UpdateTransferred to Supreme Court. (COA)
04/05/2022Case Status UpdateTransferred from Court of Appeals. (SC)
04/05/2022Case Status UpdateCase Closed. (SC)
04/05/2022RemittiturIssued Remittitur. (SC)22-10569
04/05/2022Case Status UpdateRemittitur Issued/Case Closed. (SC)
04/11/2022RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on April 6, 2022. (SC)22-10569
05/09/2022Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled District Court Docket Entries. (SC)22-14734
Original Case View